Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
RJ Noble Temescal Valley asphalt plant land use→At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 18, 2026.
Public comments (3)
A Temescal Valley resident living across from the quarry argued the heavy-industrial request was filed outside Ordinance 348's 60-day window and is therefore void, and said RJ Noble's 2019 permit revision doubling production to 1.2 million tons a year went through without required environmental review — and demanded a traffic study.
Riverside County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting — March 18, 2026 · 26:49 →A Temescal Valley resident said the plant already doubled production, that RJ Noble walked out of the 2019 TMAC process when it faced community opposition, and proposed a citizens oversight committee for the whole mining area.
Riverside County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting — March 18, 2026 · 30:35 →A Temescal Valley resident presented slides arguing the heavy-industrial designation conflicts with the area plan's light-industrial mapping, that surrounding uses are residential, and that the plant mirrors RJ Noble's Orange County facility, which has documented air quality problems and PM10 dust concerns.
Riverside County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting — March 18, 2026 · 33:31 →